116 Ind. App. 322 - McDaniels v. McDaniels’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1999 · most notably 117 Ind. App. 379 - Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division (1947), Marriage of K. B. v. S. B. (1981)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Indiana Insurance Co. v. Handlon · Scanlin v. Stewart · Cheney v. State ex rel. Risk · Smith v. Dodds · Board of Commissioners v. Millikan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"When any matter of a civil, statutory, or equitable nature not triable by a jury, is pending, the judge before whom said cause is pending shall change the venue thereof upon the application of either party to such cause, made upon affidavit, of either party or his attorney, showing any one or more of the reasons named in the statutes of this state authorizing changes of venue from the judge in civil actions... ."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Appellant's contention that the finding and decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient *Page 272 evidence and is contrary to law requires a review of the evidence. "It is well settled that this court cannot weigh conflicting evidence and, if there is any substantial evidence in the record to sustain the finding and decision of the trial court, the judgment must be affirmed. In this connection it must be borne in mind that the trial judge, as the trier of the facts, was not bound by the testimony of any single witness or any particular item of evidence. It was his exclusive province to judge and determine the credibility of witnesses, weigh the evidence, . . . We have examined the record and find the evidence is conflicting and that there is substantial evidence to sustain the decision of the trial court. Upon appeal this court cannot substitute its judgment as to the weight of the evidence for that of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bitner v. Bitner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.