Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ind. App. 631 - Bills v. Boettcher

116 Ind. App. 631 - Bills v. Boettcher’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1997

5 state decisions

40194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rooker v. Bruce · Klingler v. Ottinger · New Albany National Bank v. Brown · State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Boyd · Marion Trust Co. v. Bennett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Furthermore, while it is generally true this court has no power to add to a special finding of facts, we may, where as in this case the evidence is before us, give heed to a fact appearing in the evidence which does not admit of dispute, in order to uphold the judgment."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.