Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 KAN 590 - State v. Bartholomew

State v. Bartholomew’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
March 1984
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1984

13 state decisions

401924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. King · State v. Pigg · State v. Ridgway · State v. Mall · State v. Beaty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The actual status of the legal title to stolen property is no concern of the thief. . .” (Syl. ¶ 6.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.