Ford v. Peck’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 1980
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ewing v. Mallison · Keith v. Stetter · Modern Woodman of America v. Hester · Pendleton v. Pendleton · State v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The term ‘residence’ shall be construed to mean the place adopted by a person as his place of habitation and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning.” (It. S. 77-201, subdiv. 23.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Ford’s domicile determined the domicile of plaintiff. Before his death none of the circumstances authorizing her to establish a separate domicile existed, and when he fixed Salina as the permanent place of his abode it became her domicile by operation of law. (Amsbaugh v. Exchange Bank, 33 Kan. 100 , 5 Pac. 384 ; Modern Woodmen v. Hester, 66 Kan. 129, 133 , 71 Pac. 279 .)” (p. 77.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Intention is, of course, a matter of fact. It is not often that intention is established by proof of a particular fact, and the trier of the fact must ordinarily reach a conclusion from proof of declarations, conduct, and a variety of circumstances.” (Ford, Adm'x, v. Peck, 116 Kan. 74 , 225 Pac. 1054 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.