Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 LA 293 - Lescale v. Joseph Schwartz Co.

Lescale v. Joseph Schwartz Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Waldo v. Morrison (1952), Manuel v. Deshotels (1926)

4 federal appellate · 55 state decisions

1601905191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wimbish v. Hamilton · Burke v. Ryan · Gardemal v. McWilliams · Vinas v. Merchants' Mutual Insurance · Grant v. Haynes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Conceding such a rule to obtain in cases like the present one, where a libel is charged to have been contained in judicial allegations, such rule could not be applied in the instant case, where the plaintiff was not a party to the suit wherein the allegations complained of were made. Not being a party to the suit, he would have no right to insist upon its being tried, so that, for all he could do, its trial might be postponed indefinitely. If it came to be tried, he would have no right to offer evidence to establish the falsity of the libelous allegations. The result of the suit, or any of the proceedings in it, could not be binding on him. Indeed, it stands to reason that one’s right of action cannot be dependent upon what shall be done in a suit to which one is not a party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.