Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 Mass. 208

Coyle v. Cleary

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 28, 1874

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1874-10-28

Tort for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s close in Taunton. Trial in the Superior Court before Allen, J., who allowed a bill of exceptions in substance as follows : It appeared in evidence that Oliver Danforth formerly owned a large tract of land in Taunton, of which the tracts now owned by the plaintiff and defendant were a part.

Relies on Hathaway v. Evans

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1874-10-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1975

7 state decisions

1018741880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1The old wall and the occupation in accordance therewith, as existing when each party to this action acquired his title and for many years before, were rightly submitted to the jury as evidence of the true line between them. Hathaway v. Evans, 108 Mass. 267. Exceptions overruled.

/116/mass/208 · .json · Public domain