¶1The evidence objected to was competent upon the question whether the defendant kept the house at the time alleged in the indictment. Commonwealth v. Stoehr, 109 Mass. 365. Commonwealth v. Dearborn, Ib. 368.
¶2 Exceptions overruled.
116 Mass. 341
Commonwealth v. Kelley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 5, 1874
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1874-11-05
<p>Upon the issue whether the defendant was at a time alleged in the indictment the keeper of a common nuisance under the Gen. Sts. e. 87, §§ 6, 7, evidence is admissible that the defendant sold liquor in the tenement on a day certain about eight weeks before the first date alleged in the indictment, and had gone in and out of the tenement at various other times between that day and the first date alleged in the indictment.</p>
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1895
6 state decisions
Relies on Commonwealth v. Stoehr
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1874-11-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →