Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Md. App. 497 - Whitehead v. State

116 Md. App. 497 - Whitehead v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
4
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Ferris v. State (1999), 132 Md. App. 598 - Charity v. State (2000)

70 state decisions

370199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Whren v. United States · United States v. Place · 94 Ill. 2d 160 - People v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The nervousness, or lack of it, of the driver pulled over by a Maryland State trooper is not sufficient to form the basis of police suspicion that the driver is engaged in the illegal transportation of drugs. There is no earthly way that a police officer can distinguish the nervousness of an ordinary citizen under such circumstances from the nervousness of a criminal who traffics in narcotics. An individual’s physiological reaction to a proposed intrusion into his or her privacy cannot establish probable cause or even grounds to suspect. Permitting [a] citizen’s nervousness to be the basis for a finding of probable cause would confer upon the police a degree of discretion not grounded in police expertise, and, moreover, would be totally insusceptible to judicial review. ...””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In asking the questions, Trooper Donovan was not making inquiry to further the enforcement of the 55 mile speed limit. He was looking for justification to intrude upon the privacy of the person whom he had detained.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Stopping a car for speeding does not confer the right to abandon or never begin to take action related to the traffic laws ....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.