116 Md. App. 69 - Malpas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Hoffa v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · Illinois v. Somerville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when an oral communication is intercepted, determining whether a violation of the Wiretap Act occurred hinges on a jury determination that at least one of the parties had a reasonable expectation of privacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we apply the two-pronged inquiry applicable to search and seizure cases set forth in Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347 , 361, 88 S.Ct. 507 , 516, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (Harlan, J. concurring).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Agnew v. State“Statements in one apartment made in a tone of voice so loud as to be audible to persons in adjacent apartments are the functional equivalent of statements knowingly exposed to the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.