Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 MISS 705 - Albritton v. Fairley

Albritton v. Fairley’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2004

11 state decisions

401917192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois Central Railroad v. LeBlanc · Dodds v. Marx · Wheeler v. Lynch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we think that the assessment and tax deed furnish the clue or reasonably definite starting point, which, when followed by the aid of other testimony, conducts certainly to the land intended, and oral testimony and documentary proof may be introduced for this purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.