Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 MOAPP 332 - Shaw v. Goldman

Shaw v. Goldman’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
October 1939
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1939 · most notably Loehring v. Westlake Construction Co. (1906), Evans v. Massman Construction Co. (1938)

26 state decisions

1301906191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faris v. Hoberg · Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co. · 7 Mo. App. 556 - Casey v. Steinmeyer · Barney v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad · Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is abundantly established that one who enters upon the premises-by permission only, without invitation, enticement or allurement held out to him by the occupier or owner or some representative thereof, enters there, at the very best, by mere permission, becomes a licensee only and enjoys the license at his own risk, or as it has been well said, he enjoys the license with its concomitant perils and takes upon himself whatever risk from pitfalls or other obstructions that may attend such merely permissive entry and in such case, no duty is imposed by law upon the owner or occupier to keep the premises in a suitable condition for those who go there solely for their own convenience or pleasure or to satisfy their curiosity.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.