¶1It appears from tbe record that tbe only question was which party should pay tbe costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. State v. Railroad, 74 N. C., 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N. C., 93.
¶2Appeal dismissed.
116 N.C. 38
Futrell v. Deanes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 15, 1895
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1895-02-15
Civin actioN, for the recovery of land, tried before Armfield, J., and a jury, at Spring Term, 1894, of ITebt-Rokd Superior Court. There was no objection to the rulings or charge of the Court, or to the issues submitted.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1914
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1895-02-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →