Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 N.C. 38

20 S.E 1013

Futrell v. . Deanes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1895-02-05

Relies on State v. Richmond & Danville Railroad · State Ex Rel. Herring v. Pugh · Hasty v. . Funderburk

Decided 1895-02-05

¶1It appears from the record that the only question was, which party should pay the costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. S.v. R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93.

¶2Appeal dismissed.

¶3Cited: Elliott v. Tyson, post, 184; Monroe v. Angel, post, 847; Elliottv. Tyson, 117 N.C. 115; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438; Van Dyke v. Ins.Co., 174 N.C. 81.

/116/nc/38 · .json · Public domain