¶1Defendant presents four questions on appeal concerning his sentencing. Because defendant was not entitled to appellate review as a matter of right, we dismiss his appeal.
¶2N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(e) (1988) provides in pertinent part:
Except as provided in subsection (al) of this section and G.S. 15A-979, and except when a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest has been denied, the defendant is not entitled to appellate review as a matter of right when he has entered a plea of guilty or no contest to a criminal charge in the superior court, but he may petition the appellate division for review by writ of certiorari.
¶3N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(al) provides in pertinent part:
A defendant who has been found guilty, or entered a plea of guilty or no contest to a felony, is entitled to appeal as a matter of *356right the issue of whether his sentence is supported by evidence introduced at the trial and sentencing hearing only if the prison term of the sentence exceeds the presumptive term set by G.S. 15A-1340.4, and if the judge was required to make findings as to aggravating or mitigating factors pursuant to this Article.
¶4N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979(b) (1988) provides that “[a]n order finally denying a motion to suppress evidence may be reviewed upon an appeal from a judgment of conviction, including a judgment entered upon a plea of guilty.”
¶5In this case, defendant pled guilty. He did not move to withdraw his guilty plea nor did he move to suppress evidence. Therefore, he is entitled to appeal as a matter of right whether his sentence is supported by evidence introduced at his sentencing hearing only if (1) the prison term of his sentence exceeds the presumptive term set by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.4 (1988) and (2) the trial court was required to make findings as to aggravating or mitigating factors.
¶6If the trial court imposes a prison term different from the presumptive, it must ordinarily make appropriate findings as to aggravating or mitigating factors. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.4(b). However, the trial court need not make findings as to aggravating or mitigating factors if it “imposes a prison term pursuant to any plea arrangement as to sentence.” Id.
¶7Here, defendant’s eighteen-year prison sentence is in excess of the combined presumptive terms of the offenses and would ordinarily require the trial court to make findings as to aggravating and mitigating factors. See State v. Kamtsiklis, 94 N.C. App. 250, 380 S.E.2d 400, appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 325 N.C. 711, 388 S.E.2d 466 (1989). However, defendant pled guilty pursuant to a plea arrangement which provided “exposure . . . limited to 40 years,” and the arrangement amounts to a plea arrangement “as to sentence.” See State v. Simmons, 64 N.C. App. 727, 308 S.E.2d 95 (1983), disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 310, 312 S.E.2d 654 (1984). Therefore, the trial court was not required to make finding as to aggravating or mitigating factors. The findings made by the trial court may be disregarded as surplusage. See Simmons, 64 N.C. App. 727, 308 S.E.2d 95.
¶8Because the trial court was not required to make findings as to aggravating or mitigating factors, defendant was not entitled to appeal as a matter of right. His appeal must be dismissed.