116 N.C. App. 584 - Lee v. Bir’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 34 N.C. App. 503 - Love v. Pressley · Hinson v. Dawson · Levitch v. Levitch · 98 N.C. App. 663 - Tin Originals, Inc. v. Colonial Tin Works, Inc. · Love v. Pressley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because defendant failed to assert the insufficiency of the evidence to support plaintiffs' action for trespass or an award of actual damages as grounds for his motion for a directed verdict, defendant has waived his right to appellate review of these issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.