116 N.C. App. 658 - Bustle v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Craver v. Craver · Pruitt v. . Wood · State v. Fennell · State v. Thomas · 103 N.C. App. 31 - Hines v. Arnold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“direct the attention of the appellate court to the particular error about which the question is made, with clear and specific transcript references.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“limited to the issues presented by assignments of error set out in the record on appeal; where the issue presented in the appellant's brief does not correspond to a proper assignment of error, the matter is not properly considered by the appellate court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reference[s] to the assignments of error pertinent to the question, identified by their numbers and by the pages at which they appear in the printed record on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.