Paschall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
June 2014
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Custis v. United States · Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. City of Boulder City · State v. Glusman · State ex rel. Brockliss v. Jepsen · Erwin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e decline this opportunity to adopt such a strict rule limiting collateral attacks and note that we are not bound by the Custis decision as it involved a federal sentencing law not at issue here and merely established the floor for federal constitutional purposes as to when collateral attacks of prior convictions may be prohibited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Maine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.