State v. Ramos’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2022
2 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · State v. Sutphin · State v. Franklin · State v. Garcia · State v. Boyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In connection with the offer to sell, sale, offer to purchase or purchase of a security, a person shall not, directly or indirectly: A. employ any device, scheme or artifice to defraud; B. make an untrue statement of a material fact or fail to state a necessary material fact where such an omission would be misleading; or C. engage in an act, practice or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must provide fair and adequate warning to a person of ordinary intelligence of the conduct which is prohibited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“impermissibly vague in all its applications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.