State v. Alberico’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Frye v. United States · 36 Cal. 3d 236 - People v. Bledsoe · State v. Moran · State v. Middleton · State v. Marks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“generally recognized principles governing the admissibility of expert testimony compel us to join those jurisdictions barring testimony concerning [PTSD] when the testimony suggests that the witness possesses special skills in determining from a psychological diagnosis that an alleged victim was in fact sexually assaulted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alberico“there is general acceptance for PTSD as a diagnosis for a psychological condition that may result when an individual experiences an event that is outside the range of the usual human experience and that would be markedly distressing to anyone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alberico“it appears to be universal practice for appellate courts to decide whether a type of scientific evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted at trial. We should not abandon the rule of law in the name of trial-court discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alberico
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.