Rummel v. Edgemont Realty Partners, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 district · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Herrera Ex Rel. Estate of Ruiz v. Quality Pontiac (2003), Ciup v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (1996)
2 district · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 36 Cal. 3d 799 - Peterson v. San Francisco Community College District · Calkins v. Cox Estates · Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment Corp. · Ramirez v. Armstrong · Mantz v. Follingstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to dismiss pursuant to [Rule] 1-012(B)(6) [NMRA 2003] tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint. In reviewing an order granting a motion to dismiss, we accept as true all facts properly pleaded. A complaint is subject to dismissal under [Rule] 1-012(B)(6) only if under no state of facts provable thereunder would a plaintiff be entitled to relief---- Under this standard of review only the law applicable to such claim is tested, not the facts which support it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.