State v. Aragon’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2017
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Burks v. United States · Green v. United States · United States v. DiFrancesco · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because our habitual criminal proceedings are not `prosecutions' of an `offense' and sentencing does not imply guilt or innocence of any greater crime, ... double jeopardy does not attach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The defendant's primary concern and anxiety obviously relate to the determination of innocence or guilt, and that already is behind him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“double jeopardy [does] not attach to the habitual offender proceeding ... because ... there was no prosecution of an offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.