Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 N.M. 284 - State v. Bunce

State v. Bunce’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably State v. Cunningham (2000), State v. Clifford (1994)

31 state decisions

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Figueroa v. United States · State v. Ortega · State v. Gonzales · State v. Osborne · State v. Romero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court need not give a mistake of fact instruction ‘where the intent element of the crime is adequately defined by the other instructions given by the trial court'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the embezzlement and intent instructions do not adequately define the requisite intent, Defendant was entitled to an instruction on mistake of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on his theories of the case if that [sic] theory is supported by the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.