Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 NM 365 - Dunleavy v. Miller

Dunleavy v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · 114 Wash. 2d 907 - Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. Kallevig · Scott v. Rizzo · State v. Fish · Ott v. Keller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who, without negligence on [his] [her] part, is suddenly and unexpectedly confronted with peril, arising from either the actual presence or the appearance of an imminent danger to [himself] [herself] or another, is not expected nor required to use the same judgment and prudence that is required of [him] [her] in the exercise of ordinary care in calmer and more deliberate moments. [His] [Her] duty is to exercise only the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the same situation. If, at that moment, [he] [she] does what appears to [him] [her] to be the best thing to do and if [his] [her] choice and manner of action are the same as might have been followed by any reasonably prudent person under the same conditions, then [he] [she] has done all that the law requires of [him] [her], even though, in the light of after events, it might appear that a different course would have been better and safer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.