State v. Lancaster’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Idaho v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“D. Statements which are not hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if: (1) Prior statement by witness. The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is (a) inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition [.] (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gutierrez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.