Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 N.M. 431 - State v. Gutierrez

State v. Gutierrez’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

168
cited by 168 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

164 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 168 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2023 · most notably State v. Gomez (1997), Heien v. North Carolina (2014)

164 state decisions — followed in 11 states

5801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes and effects, from unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing the place to be searched, or the persons or things to be seized, nor without a written showing of probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Denying the government the fruits of unconstitutional conduct at trial best effectuates the constitutional proscription of unreasonable searches and seizures by preserving the rights of the accused to the same extent as if the government's officers had stayed within the law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.