Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 N.M. 450 - State v. Lucero

State v. Lucero’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

163
cited by 163 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 155 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 163 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Rojo (1998), State v. Barber (2004)

6 federal appellate · 155 state decisions

5801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Disbarment of McManus · State v. Orosco · State v. Alberico · State v. Clark · State v. Altgilbers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 163 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is the responsibility of counsel at trial to elicit a definitive ruling on an objection from the court. It is also trial counsel's duty to state the objections so that the trial court may rule intelligently on them and so that an appellate court does not have to guess at what was and what was not an issue at trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “{42} The doctrine of fundamental error should be applied sparingly, to prevent a miscarriage of justice, and not to excuse the failure to make proper objections in the court below. With regard to a criminal conviction, the doctrine is resorted to only if the defendant’s innocence appears indisputable or if the question of his [or her] guilt is so doubtful that it would shock the conscience to permit the conviction to stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The doctrine of fundamental error is to be resorted to in criminal cases only for the protection of those whose innocence appears indisputably, or open to such question that it would shock the conscience to permit the conviction to stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.