← 116 Ohio App. 3d 320 - Williams v. Williams

116 Ohio App. 3d 320 - Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

cited by 14 later decisions

states following

June 2007

most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kaechele v. Kaechele · Bechtol v. Bechtol · 48 Ohio App. 2d 85 - Swanson v. Swanson · 53 Ohio App. 3d 31 - Birath v. Birath · 14 Ohio App. 2d 120 - Rivers v. Rivers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“any other factor that the court expressly finds to be relevant and equitable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Harris v. Harris, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2004) · Forbis v. Forbis, Unpublished Decision (11-4-2005)
“appropriate and reasonable, and in determining the nature, amount, and terms of payment, and duration of spousal support,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Leopold v. Leopold, Unpublished Decision (1-21-2005)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.