116 Ohio App. 3d 389 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “where the evidence demonstrates that by placing money into a video slot machine a player can acquire or win, purely by chance, additional playing time on that machine without paying additional money, thereby gaining added amusement, the state has proved the existence of a "game of chance”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bryant, Ca2007-02-024 (6-23-2008) · 800 So. 2d 110 - MISSISSIPPI GAMING COM'N v. Henson

2. “with heedless indifference to the consequences, * * * perversely disregard[ed] a known risk that his conduct [was] likely to cause a certain result or [was] likely to be of a certain nature. A person is reckless with respect to circumstances when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, he perversely disregards a known risk that such circumstances are likely to exist.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bryant, Ca2007-02-024 (6-23-2008)

3. “amusement has value and added amusement has additional value, and where added amusement is subject to be procured by chance without the payment of additional consideration thereof, there is involved in the game the elements of gambling namely, price, chance, and a prize.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 800 So. 2d 110 - MISSISSIPPI GAMING COM'N v. Henson