116 Ohio App. 3d 441 - In Re Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 160 Ohio App. 3d 552 - In Re D.S. (2005), State v. Bryant (2022)
81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lott · State v. Eskridge · 99 Ohio App. 3d 275 - State v. Mundy · 81 Ohio App. 3d 179 - State v. Cobb · 36 Ohio App. 3d 247 - State v. Astley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any touching of an erogenous zone of another, including without limitation the thigh, genitals, buttock, pubic region, or, if the person is a female, a breast, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying either person.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the trier of fact determines that the defendant was motivated by desires of sexual arousal or gratification, and that the contact occurred, then the trier of fact may conclude that the object of the defendant's motivation was achieved.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Whether the touching was performed for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification is a question of fact to be inferred from the type, nature, and circumstances of the contact.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.