116 Ohio App. 3d 447 - Johnson v. Allonas’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2023
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · 5 Ohio App. 3d 179 - Garrard v. McComas · Pulley v. Malek · 88 Ohio App. 3d 220 - Khamis v. Everson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the owner, keeper, or harborer of a dog is liable in damages for any injury, death, or loss to person or property that is caused by the dog * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“physical charge of care of the dog at the time of the accident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is not within the class of people the legislature intended to protect through the strict liability provision. The legislature did not intend to protect those persons (the owner, keeper, or harborer of the dog) who have, by the terms of the statute, an absolute duty to control the dog. Rather, the legislature intended to protect those people who are not in a position to control the dog. Because appellant was a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.