116 Ohio App. 3d 477 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “he determined that appellant was not ill, injured, or dead. Based on the record, no crime was committed by appellant. As such, appellant could not mislead, hamper, or impede the investigation of a crime since no crime took place. Thus, appellant should not have been found guilty of obstructing official business. Simply giving an officer a false social security number is not obstruction. {¶ 36} Our opinion should not be read as a proscription of an officer's attempt to render assistance to an individual in a parked car who appears to be”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2006)

2. “appellant's vehicle was not observed in motion; there could thus be no reasonable suspicion of any traffic violation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Thompson, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2005)