116 Ohio App. 3d 549 - Vance v. Trimble’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2012
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied Companies · Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even if we assume that [the decedent's] need for the Darvocet was triggered by a desire to alleviate the pain that resulted from the injury to his hand, [the decedent's] death was `purposely self-inflicted,' in that he voluntarily took an overdose of Darvocet.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in determining whether [the decedent's] death was accidental, the determinative factor is whether the act leading to his death was intentional. * * * [The decedent] must only have intended to take the prescribed medication in excess of the recommended dosage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“one capsule every three, four hours for pain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.