Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ohio App. 3d 753 - State v. Brandle

116 Ohio App. 3d 753 - State v. Brandle’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 20 Ohio App. 2d 170 - State v. Pettit · 15 Ohio App. 3d 97 - State v. Coker · 84 Ohio App. 3d 229 - State v. Morgan · 2 Ohio App. 3d 71 - State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[I]t is sufficient to support a conviction of carrying a concealed weapon to prove only that ordinary observation would give no notice of its presence. This is a question of fact to be resolved by the trier of fact. There must be an evidentiary basis established by the proof upon which the jury could find that the weapon was concealed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] criminal defendant is generally entitled to appear in court without shackles, as the presumption of innocence may be undermined when the defendant is presented in restraints.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.