Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ohio App. 3d 781 - Stafinsky v. Stafinsky

116 Ohio App. 3d 781 - Stafinsky v. Stafinsky’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably 151 Ohio App. 3d 682 - Earnest v. Earnest (2003), Howcroft v. Howcroft (2010)

38 state decisions

2101996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Kaechele v. Kaechele · Berish v. Berish · Martin v. Martin · 110 Ohio App. 3d 487 - Schneider v. Schneider

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n making spousal support awards, R.C. 3105.18 requires the trial court to review the statutory factors in [R.C. 3105.18 (C)(1)] that support such an order, and then indicate the basis for awarding spousal support in sufficient detail to facilitate adequate appellate review. Kaechele v. Kaechele (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d 93 , 96-97 * * *.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “decision is discretionary and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.