116 Ohio App. 3d 86 - State v. Tolbert’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2008
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · Steagald v. United States · State v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o person shall possess or have under the person's control any substance, device, instrument, or article with purpose to use it criminally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.