Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 Ohio St. 3d 1228

State v. Osborne

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2008

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2008-01-30

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2009

3 state decisions

Relies on State v. Bezak · Tenney v. Gen. Elec. Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-01-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} Appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of the discretionary appeal in this matter, reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2007-Ohio-6140, 876 N.E.2d 970.

¶2{¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. V, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, and the cause is remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.Lanzinger, J., dissents.
/116/ohiost3d/1228 · .json · Public domain