Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 R.I. 425 - State v. Aurgemma

State v. Aurgemma’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
10
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably State v. O'CONNELL (1979), State v. Roddy (1979)

46 state decisions — followed in 10 states

17019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holland v. United States · 42 Cal. 2d 246 - People v. Ashley · 55 Cal. 2d 514 - People v. Bailey · Van Hoff v. Redevelopment Agency of San Francisco · State v. Mancini

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““a conviction for obtaining property by false pretenses hinges on the actual loss suffered by the victim, rather than on the amount of money paid or the worth of the property transferred, and that consequently the state’s failure to offer any evidence that the value of the work left undone by him exceeded $500 precluded a felony conviction.” 116 R.I. at 429 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Stephens
  2. ““Entry of building or ship with felonious intent. — Every person who, with intent to commit * * * larceny, shall, * * * during the daytime, enter any other building * « * shall be imprisoned not more than ten (10) years or be fined not more than five hundred dollars ($500) or suffer both such fine and imprisonment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bailey v. Baronian

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.