Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 S.C. 247

107 S.E 905

Davis v. Huff

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1921

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1921-06-30

Before PpuriPoy, J., Newberry, April, 1917. Action in claim and delivery By Adams Davis against Beaufort Matthews Huff and W. P. Allen. From order setting aside seizure of property the plaintiff appeals. cite: was case should have been heard on its merits: Code Proc. 1912, Sec. 184. He being agent of the owner: Sec. 290 Id. Plaintiff had right to replevy within 5 days after distress: 1 Civ. Code, 1912, Sec. 3521; 46 S. C., 199.

Reversed · Decided 1921-06-30

¶1 The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

¶2 Appeal from an order of Circuit Judge,'setting aside as illegal a seizure of certain personal property (taken possession of by the sheriff under claim and delivery proceedings), upon the ground that the landlord, under whose distress warrant the property had been distrained by her agent for rent past due, had not been served with process, although the agent in whose possession the property was seized was duly served.

¶3 Although the landlord was a nonresident, the tenant, who claimed that the distress was illegal, had the right to sue the agent in possession under claim and delivery proceedings, and serve the landlord by publication. This right he was denied by the order.

¶4 The order is reversed, with leave to the defendant Mrs. Huff to answer the complaint within 20 days from the filing of the remittitue, if she be so advised; otherwise, that the plaintiff have leave to serve her by publication.

/116/sc/247 · .json · Public domain