Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 So. 2d 175 - Quarles v. Albritton

116 So. 2d 175 - Quarles v. Albritton’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trappey v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. · E. B. Hayes Machinery Co. v. Eastham · Ingersoll Corporation v. Rogers · Labat v. Labat · Jeffries v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a partnership is an abstract ideal being with legal relations separate and distinct from those of its individual members; * * *. `It is a civil person which has its peculiar rights and attributes.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Mrs. Oliver Adolph, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Dale, Susette and Jean, Mrs. Oliver Adolph, Individually and on Behalf of Her Monor Children, Dale, Susette and Jean v. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.