Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 So. 2d 23

Dean v. Deas

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 25, 1959

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1959-11-25

Relies on 116 So. 2d 16 - Carraway v. Revell · Carraway v. Revell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1959-11-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1980

9 state decisions

501959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for rehearing in this case brings to our attention the per curiam order of the district court, affirming an order of the circuit court dismissing petitioner’s amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action under the guest statute, which was rendered on March 31, 1959, five days after the rendition of the opinion of the district court in Carraway v. Revell, 112 So.2d 71. The holding of the district court in Carraway v. Revell has been over*24ruled by an opinion of this Court filed this day, 116 So.2d 16.

¶2In view of the overruling by this Court of the opinion of the district court in Carraway v. Revell, supra, by the opinion filed this day, 116 So.2d 16, and, in view of the probability that the entry of the per curiam order hereinabove referred to was based upon the holding of the district court in Carraway v. Revell, supra, jurisdiction in this cause is returned to the district court for further consideration of the per curiam order entered in this case in the light of our holding in the opinion of this day overruling the district court in Carraway v. Revell.

TERRELL, HOBSON,' ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.THOMAS, C. J., and THORNAL, J., dissent.
/116/so2d/23 · .json · Public domain