Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 So. 2d 301 - Harrelson v. Raphael

116 So. 2d 301 - Harrelson v. Raphael’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1973
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Since we feel that the plaintiff made an error in addition and feel also that the defendant realized this error and sought to take advantage of it, we think that the minds of the parties did not meet and that consequently no contract resulted.” 116 So.2d 301, 303 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Had the defendant not himself totaled the three items, we feel that we would encounter difficulty in holding him liable for more than the total set forth on the document which was prepared by the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.