Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 So. 3d 270 - Polite v. State

116 So. 3d 270 - Polite v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Porter · 336 So. 2d 566 - Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc. · Volusia County Bank v. Bigelow · State v. Marcy · 426 So. 2d 548 - Middleton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge, but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been made by the witness when the matter was fresh in the witness's memory and to reflect that knowledge correctly. A party may read into evidence a memorandum or record when it is admitted, but no such memorandum or record is admissible as an exhibit unless offered by an adverse party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To be admitted into evidence, the past recollection recorded must be offered by the witness who is either devoid of a present recollection, or possessed of an imperfect present recollection and desires to use a memorandum or a past recollection.”); § 90.803(5), Fla. Stat. (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.