Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 So. 3d 654

In re Ferrara

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 26, 2013

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2013-04-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2017

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

¶2hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent drafted an affidavit at the request of his criminal defense client in which the victim in the underlying criminal proceeding agreed to drop the criminal charges in exchange for the payment of money. Thereafter, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Frank J. Ferrara, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 5539, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty *655days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

/116/so3d/654 · .json · Public domain