Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 S.W.3d 697

State v. McDowell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-09-16

Decided 2003-09-16

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2The defendant, Undra McDowell, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for class C felony possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202 RSMo. (2000). In his sole point on appeal, the defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial and in denying his motion for a new trial on grounds of alleged juror misconduct.

¶3We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. We find no abuse of discretion. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/116/sw3d/697 · .json · Public domain