Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 TENN 98 - McCampbell v. State

McCampbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1987
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1987

4 state decisions

20190519101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Repeals by implication are never favored, and especially is this true as to an act passed to deal with a particular or special subject, while the later act is general in character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.