116 Tex. Crim. 196 - Pond v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1971
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The verdict of the jury, in so many words, finds appellant guilty of possessing liquor for the purpose of sale, as charged in the indictment, and fixes her punishment * * * “It would be idle for us to cite authorities holding that the verdict, the judgment, and the sentence must follow the indictment. They wholly failing to do so, we have no option but to reverse and remand this cause, which is accordingly done * * * 99”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wright v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.