Cannon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
116 U.S. 55 · 1885
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2010 · most notably Cannon v. United States (1886), Ex Parte Nielsen (1889)
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Carll · United States v. Britton · Murphy v. Ramsey · United States v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The word is never used in its' first [archaic] meaning' in a criminal statute; and its second meaning is that to which its use in this statute has relation. The context in which it is- found, and the manifest evils which gave rise to the special enactments in regard to ‘cohabitation,’ require that the word should have the meaning which we have assigned to it. Bigamy and polygamy might fail of proof for want of direct evidence of any marriage; but cohabitation with more than one woman, in the sense proved in this case, was susceptible of the proof here given; and it was such offense as was here proved that section 3 of the act was intended to reach, — the exhibition of all the indicia of a marriage, a household, and a family, twice repeated.” 116 U. S. at pages 74, 75, 6 S. Ct. at pages 288, 289, 29 L. Ed. 561 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barlow“An Act to punish and prevent the practice of polygamy in the Territories of the United States and other places, and disapproving and annulling certain Acts of the legislative Assembly of the Territory of Utah,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.