Rohrer v. Strickland’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2018
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holdsworth v. Shannon · Dexter v. Shepard · Vail v. Jacobs · Williamson v. Dale · Wilson v. Wall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it appears that going on with the sale at the appointed time will result in a great sacrifice of the property, it is [the trustee's] positive duty to adjourn the sale”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the price obtained for property at a trustee's sale is so grossly inadequate as to shock the conscience of the chancellor, the sale will be set aside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a trustee finds there is no bidder present except the creditor, or only sham bidders, he should adjourn the sale.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wright v. Kellam
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.