Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Crane

116 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Crane’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 113 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland (1995), State v. Copeland (1996)

2 federal appellate · 113 state decisions

5801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Workman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a continuing course of conduct may form the basis of one charge in an information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"To convict the defendant, Linda L. Craven, of the crime of assault in the second degree, as charged in count 1 (skull fracture), each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: "(1) That during a period of time intervening December 16, 1989, and January 6, 1990, the defendant intentionally assaulted Christopher Riley; "(2) That by the assault the defendant recklessly inflicted substantial bodily harm on Christopher Riley; and "(3) That the acts occurred in King County, Washington." Instruction 11 provides in part: "To convict the defendant, Linda L. Craven, of the crime of assault in the second degree, as charged in count 2 (other injuries), each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: "(1) That during a period of time intervening December 16, 1989, and January 6, 1990, the defendant intentionally assaulted Christopher Riley; "(2) That by the assault the defendant recklessly inflicted substantial bodily harm on Christopher Riley; and "(3) That the acts occurred in King County, Washington."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that all 12 jurors must agree that the same underlying criminal act has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.