Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Wash. 2d 531 - State v. Ray

116 Wash. 2d 531 - State v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 95 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Copeland (1996), Barker v. Fleming (2005)

3 federal appellate · 95 state decisions

4301991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Luce v. United States · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t informs the court of the legal theory under which the offered evidence is admissible; it informs the judge of the specific nature of the offered evidence so that the court can assess its admissibility; and it creates a record adequate for review.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the 'counsel' guaranteed ... by the Sixth Amendment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “... within reasonable probabilities, had the error not occurred, the outcome of the trial would have been materially affected.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.